Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6574
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrington v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv15356
Plaintiff:
Patricia Harrington
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrington v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04726
Plaintiff:
Patricia Harrington
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrington v. Airbnb
as 3:2017cv00557
Defendant:
Airbnb
Plaintiff:
Patricia Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declarato
Harrington v. Airbnb
as 3:2017cv00558
Defendant:
Airbnb, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declarato
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vera Harper v. United Services Auto. Assoc.
as 11-1194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERA C. HARPER and DAVID A. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, a/k/a USAA, STEPHEN HORVATH, DOES 1-50 and others
Harper et al v. United Services Automobile Association et al
as 6:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
Vera C. Harper and David A. Harper
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association, Judge Jane Marum Roush, Judge M. Langhorne Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRINGTON v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv68316
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA HARRINGTON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS FACILITY, JOHN CRANE FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
