Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Gordon et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03371
Plaintiff:
Marquis (I) Gillen, Robert Duran, Glenda (I) Bailey and others
Defendant:
Kidde PLC, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., National Foam Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv01065
Plaintiff:
Robert Duran, Murray Smith, William Ray and others
Defendant:
Kidde PLC, Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc., The 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Dill v. Probate Court et al
as 3:2009cv05100
Plaintiff:
Charles Patrick Dill
Defendant:
- Probate Court, Probate Administration and Probate Court Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DG, et al v. DeVaughn, et al
as 09-5093
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DG, by Next Friend G. Gail Stricklin, CS, by Next Friend Barbara Sears, JB, a minor, by Next Friend Buddy Faye Foster and others
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD L. DEVAUGHN, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Oklahoma Commission for Human Services, RONALD L. MERCER, in his official capacity as Vice-Chairman of the Oklahoma Commission for Human Services, JAY DEE CHASE and others
Movant:
WHITE FIELDS, INC., OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN, OKLAHOMA UNITED METHODIST CIRCLE OF CARE and others
DeVaughn, et al v. CS, et al
as 09-703
Petitioner:
RICHARD L. DEVAUGHN, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Oklahoma Commission for Human Services, RONALD L. MERCER, in his official capacity as Vice-Chairman of the Oklahoma Commission for Human Services, JAY DEE CHASE, in his official capacity as a member of the Oklahoma Commission for Human Services and others
Respondent:
CS, by next friend Barbara Sears, DG, by next friend G. Gail Stricklin, AP, by next friend Leslie A. Ellis Kissinger and others
Dill v. Krueger
as 1:2007cv01811
Plaintiff:
Charles Patrick Dill
Defendant:
Don Krueger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
