Cases 1 - 10 of 194
Johnson v. Govenor Newsome And Marin County
as 1:2024cv02135
Petitioner:
Paul Samuel Johnson
Respondent:
Govenor Newsome And Marin County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. Stahl et al
as 0:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Johnson
Defendant:
Kevin Stahl, Tyler Johnson and Kevin Lease
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. CIR
as 24-60077
Petitioner:
Paul Edwin Johnson
Respondent:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Paul Johnson, Jr. v. United States of America
as 24-10407
Petitioner:
PAUL R. JOHNSON, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Johnson v. Reeves
as 1:2023cv04364
Petitioner:
Paul Lamont Johnson
Respondent:
Angela Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Floyd et al
as 2:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Paul Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Tommy Franklin Floyd, American Commerical Transportation and GuideOne Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. Sullivan
as 0:2023cv02249
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Johnson
Defendant:
Ryan Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Reed et al
as 0:2023cv02130
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Johnson, Marcie Henning and Nada Van Asch
Defendant:
Franklin Reed, Todrick Barnette, Scott Jerry Seiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
In re: Alex Ulep, et al v. State of California, et al
as 23-15806
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO DELGADILLO LOPEZ, ALEX LOPEZ, ALEX ULEP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Paul Johnson v. Ronald Broomfield, et al
as 23-15376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden and L. TOBIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
