Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Zynda et al v. Price et al
as 2:2024cv04243
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Miranda, Isaias Mendoza, Linda Mears and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Zynda et al v. Price et al
as 2:2024cv00867
Plaintiff:
Robert Mincey, Michael Muelling, Danny Mills and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Ray Price, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Zynda et al v. Price et al
as ALN/2:24-cv-00867
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Zynda, Jose L Lopez, Guadalupe Lopez, IV and others
Bradley v. Allen et al
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dana Ruby Bradley
Defendant:
Wes Allen, Nancy Dahlstrom, Adrian Fontes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Bensley v. Pate et al
as 4:2020cv00329
Defendant:
Jamie Fitzgerald and Paul Pate
Plaintiff:
Jessica Bensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ostrowski v. Office of Elections et al
as 1:2020cv00209
Defendant:
Lt. Governor Spencer Cox, Secretary of State Jim Condos, Wisconsin Election Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ostrowski
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Rogue De La Fuente v. Iowa Democratic Party, et al
as 16-2693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rogue De La Fuente, also known as Rocky
Defendant - Appellee:
Iowa Democratic Party and Paul Pate, agent of Secretary of State
De La Fuente v. Iowa Democratic Party et al
as 4:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
Rogue De La Fuente
Defendant:
Iowa Democratic Party and Paul Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pate v. Kimbro et al
as 1:2010cv01914
Plaintiff:
Paul Pate
Defendant:
Kimbro, Jail Administrator and Court Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
