Cases 1 - 10 of 303
Keith Pippins, Jr. v. Warden, North Central Correctional Institution
as 24-3374
Petitioner:
KEITH J. PIPPINS, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN, NORTH CENTRAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Pippins v. Rasco et al
as 3:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Pippins
Defendant:
Richardson Q Rasco, Steven Cliften and Felicia Pitre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pippin v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Larrann Pippin
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Pippin v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
James Pippin
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
PIPPINS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00762
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
LYDIA PIPPINS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alanjary v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Beverly Alanjary and Diana Sanchez
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Amy Vanbeekom, Demechiko French and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Charles Pippins v. Warden Ray
as 23-7208
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES DUNCAN PIPPINS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN RAY
PIPPINS v. USA
as 1:2023cv01986
Plaintiff:
IDRIS PIPPINS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Pippins v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv15700
Plaintiff:
Deborah Pippins
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pippins v. Citi Bank
as 3:2023cv05206
Plaintiff:
Idris Pippins
Defendant:
Citi Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
