Cases 31 - 40 of 11,140
Anthony Bennett v. Joseph Biden, Jr.
as 24-1306
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BENNETT, a/k/a Bennett Anthony
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., JEROME POWELL, JANET L. YELLEN and others
Petitte v. Loloft, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv05085
Plaintiff:
Craig Petitte
Defendant:
Loloft, Inc., Paola Ibarra and Brendan Powell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Assad v. Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
George Assad
Defendant:
Scott W.H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Peggy Y. Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Pete v. Wright et al
as 2:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Norman Pete
Defendant:
Charles Gary Wain Wright, Assistant District Attorney and Powell Wingfield Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riley v. Carrier Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv10907
Plaintiff:
Charles J McAtamney
Defendant:
Carrier Corporation, Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., Electrolux Home Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Denning v. Powell et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Joshua Denning
Defendant:
Robert Powell, Matt Anderson, Wesley Shuman and others
Interested Party:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denning v. Powell et al
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Joshua Denning
Defendant:
Robert Powell, Matt Anderson, Anna Lee Carlson and others
Interested Party:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
CASSIDY AARON POWELL
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
POWELL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
CASSIDY AARON POWELL
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
POWELL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
CASSIDY AARON POWELL
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
