Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Clarence Johnson, Jr. v. American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology, et al
as 22-55623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE ANESTHESIOLOGY, CNNA, CDC.GOV, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZERS and others
Chen v. Mount Sinai Beth Israel
as 22-383
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Victor C. Chen
Defendant / Appellee:
Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York State, The USA and others
Chen v. Mount Sinai Beth Israel et al
as 1:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Victor Chen
Defendant:
Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York State, The USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Frazier v. Queen Elizabeth II
as 2:2021cv00532
Plaintiff:
Melvin Frazier, Jr.
Defendant:
Queen Elizabeth II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Loyola v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2021cv02714
Plaintiff:
Miguel Loyola
Defendant:
Environmental Protection Agency, Black Lives Matter - Movement, Tyler Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarence Johnson, Jr. v. Amazon, et al
as 21-35651
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON, CRAIGS LIST OWNERS, COVID 19 and others
Maxey v. Schubert et al
as 2:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Does 1 through 500, Sacramento County District Attorneys Office, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff:
James C Maxey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YASHARA'L v FRANCIS, et al
as 5:2019cv00441
Defendant:
PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP, BILL GATES, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
MOWRIYAH ABIYAH YASHARAL and MOWRIYAH ABIYAH YASHARA'L
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Queen Elizabeth et al
as 2:2018cv00880
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Stokes
Defendant:
Queen Elizabeth, II, Prince Charles, David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
