Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Benton et al v. City of Port Wentworth, GA et al
as 4:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Georgia Benton, Leroy Benton, Sr., LaRay J. Benton and others
Defendant:
City of Port Wentworth, GA, Steven R. Brock, Chris Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dennis Brock v. Hancock County, OH Common Pleas Court
as 22-3197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS R. BROCK
Defendant / Appellee:
HANCOCK COUNTY, OH COMMON PLEAS COURT
BROCK v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv07863
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
JIMMY R. BROCK
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gardner v. Brock et al
as 2:2020cv11244
Defendant:
R. Brock and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Eric Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner #287557 v. Brock et al
as 1:2020cv00381
Defendant:
R. Brock and Unknown Party #1
Plaintiff:
Eric Andrew Gardner #287557
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brock v. Hancock County Common Pleas Court
as 3:2020cv00941
Defendant:
Hancock County Common Pleas Court
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Brock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brock v. Hancock County Common Pleas Court
as 2:2020cv02162
Defendant:
Hancock County Common Pleas Court
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Brock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROCK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv42190
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R BROCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brock v. Hancock Common Pleas Court Judge
as 3:2019cv00082
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Brock
Defendant:
Hancock Common Pleas Court Judge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Vanhoose et al
as 3:2018cv00125
Petitioner:
Roy C. Neal
Respondent:
Lelia A. Vanhoose, Larry R. Brock, Michael A. Bolcas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
