Cases 1 - 10 of 100
SLATON v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 3:2026cv00226
Plaintiff:
JEFFERSON SLATON
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Slaton v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2026cv01895
Plaintiff:
Shelbie Slaton
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
SLATON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv06384
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SLATON
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Slaton v. Armstrong
as 3:2026cv01065
Plaintiff:
Wayne Slaton
Defendant:
William Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Slaton v. Warden, Macon State Prison
as 1:2026cv04459
Petitioner:
Marcus O. Slaton
Respondent:
Warden, Macon State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jose Perez v. Mindi Nurse, et al
as 26-2366
Plaintiff:
JOSE PEREZ
Defendant:
MINDI NURSE, ADALBERTO TORREZ and RYAN SLATON
Mason et al v. Lawrence et al
as 2:2026cv01976
Plaintiff:
Elena Yancheva Yaneva and Alek Mirko Mason
Defendant:
Thomas Roger Lawrence, Thomas Lawrence Enterprises, Inc., Construction Resource Advisors, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Richards v. Slaton et al
as 7:2026cv00190
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jackson Richards
Defendant:
Scott Slaton, Brent Beal and Daryl Burt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slaton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv00019
Defendant:
Angela Slaton and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mason et al v. Lawrence et al
as 4:2025cv06310
Plaintiff:
Alek Mirko Mason and Elena Yancheva Yaneva
Defendant:
Thomas Roger Lawrence, Thomas Lawrence Enterprises, Inc., Construction Resource Advisors, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
