Cases 1 - 10 of 274
Adams v. Del Toro
as 1:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Antonio R Adams
Defendant:
Carlos Del Toro
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Leon Johnson v. F. Duty
as 24-6197
Plaintiff:
LEON JERMAINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
F. DUTY, sued in individual capacity, J. R. MASSINGILL, sued in individual capacity, J. R. ADAMS and others
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowland v. Adams, et al
as 24-4008
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE TAYLOR ROWLAND, JR.
Defendant:
R. ADAMS, Officer, FNU WEBB, Officer, B. EGBERT, Correctional Officer and others
Smith v. Duffield Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Defendant:
Duffield Jail, Chaplain R. Adams, Lt. R. Templeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. White et al
as 7:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Heath Anthony Baker and Ashley N. Baker
Defendant:
UA White, Captain Taylor, Amy Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gunther v. Adams et al
as 5:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Catherine Rose Gunther
Defendant:
Michael R. Adams, Last Chance Trucking LLC, Donald L. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
WALLACE v. OBERLANDER et al.
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT D. OBERLANDER, E. DEPUTY MONGELLOZZO, DEPUTY M. BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
James Adams v. Kemp, et al
as 23-1397
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
LAW LIBRARIAN KEMP and A. PHELPS
Adams v. Del Toro
as 1:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Antonio R Adams
Defendant:
Secretary of Navy Carlos Del Toro and Carlos Del Toro
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
