Cases 11 - 20 of 352
Gonzalez v. Pierre-Mike et al
as 1:2023cv11665
Petitioner:
Albert Gonzalez
Respondent:
Janaya Pierre-Mike and Ricardo R. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03301
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jerel Lamar Davis, James Paul Carozza, Joseph C Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Davis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00783
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jerel Lamar Davis, James Paul Carozza, Joseph C Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Wang v. VectivBio Holding AG et al
as 1:2023cv04833
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
VectivBio Holding AG, Thomas F. Woiwode, Ph.D., Paul R. Carter and others
O'Dell v. VectivBio Holding AG et al
as 1:2023cv04790
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
VectivBio Holding AG, Thomas F. Woiwode, Ph.D., Paul R. Carter and others
Bushansky v. VectivBio Holding AG et al
as 1:2023cv04745
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
VectivBio Holding AG, Thomas F. Woiwode, Paul R. Carter and others
Carter v. Husker Auto Group & Manufacturer
as 8:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Carlton R. Carter
Defendant:
Husker Auto Group & Manufacturer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STEPHANIE REESE and SYDNEY R. CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
