Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Royal v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Jarice L. Royal
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Red Onion State Prison, River North Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffery Dye v. Randee Rewerts, et al
as 20-1919
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFERY R. DYE
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDEE REWERTS, Warden and MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Dye #149800 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2020cv00746
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts and Michigan Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Dye #149800 and Jeffery R. Dye #149800
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11076
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wendt, LLP v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2018cv00311
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, George Dye and George R Dye
Plaintiff:
Wendt, LLP
Undetermined:
Anthony Stites
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DYE v. MARSHAL OF THE BROOKLYN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv02802
Plaintiff:
TERRY R DYE and TERRY R. DYE
Defendant:
BRADLEY K SHAW, INDIANA STATE POLICE, MIKE TUMMERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dye, Kathleen v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv12226
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN R DYE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dye, Kathleen v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00837
Plaintiff:
Kathleen R. Dye
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
