Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Milam, et al v. United States of America
as 1:2026cv00340
Plaintiff:
Amber Milam and John Eric Martin
Defendant:
United States of America, The
Interested Party:
Jamie Williams, Ohana Military Communities, LLC, Hunt MH Property Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Blakes v. Toliver et al
as 3:2026cv00910
Plaintiff:
Nissan SJ Blakes
Defendant:
Brian L. Toliver, Carmen M. Milam and Jeremiah L. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
US v. Roldan-Cortes
as 26-1265
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
LUIS ROLDAN-CORTES, a/k/a Wisi
Interested Party:
POLICE DEPARTMENT OF PUERTO RICO, FRANK D. INSERNI-MILAM and JOHN DOE
Smith v. Shue et al
as 2:2026cv02022
Plaintiff:
Charles Abraham Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Shue, Barret Milam, Rita Watkins Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinojosa v. Milam Oil Corporation
as 1:2026cv01011
Plaintiff:
Hugo Hinojosa
Defendant:
Milam Oil Corporation doing business as Milam Construction Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Milam et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2026cv00098
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Milam and Leslie S. Milam
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Don Lippert, et al v. Louis Shicker, et al
as 26-1228
Plaintiff:
DON LIPPERT, WILLIAM E. BASSETT, OZELL GRAYER and others
Defendant:
LOUIS SHICKER, Doctor, BRUCE V. RAUNER, JOHN BALDWIN and others
Milam v. Dynamis, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv00264
Plaintiff:
John Milam
Defendant:
Dynamis, Inc. and John A Braun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
