Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brady v. Progressive Northern Ins.
as 4:2023cv05225
Plaintiff:
Terry F Brady
Defendant:
Progressive Northern Ins. and Ayana R Reed
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Lamont Reed v. Rob Jeffreys
as 23-3164
Petitioner:
Lamont R. Reed
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Reed et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06029
Plaintiff:
Brenda Reed and Vester R. Reed, III
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
REED v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11558
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R REED
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Walker et al
as 1:2023cv00002
Defendant:
John D. Walker, Jon Walker, Hansen Helicopters, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cooper v. Canterbury-Miller et al
as 2:2022cv12921
Plaintiff:
Ricardo G. Cooper
Defendant:
Dianne M. Canterbury-Miller, Chris R. Reed and Gonzales
Anthony Perry v. Gina Raimondo, et al
as 22-5319
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony W. Perry
Defendant / Appellee:
Gina Raimondo, United States Secretary of Commerce, Merit Systems Protection Board, Brian Digiacomo, Professional and Individual Capacity, United States Department of Commerce and others
McLendon v. Green et al
as 1:2022cv01303
Plaintiff:
Juan McLendon
Defendant:
Robert L. Green, Wayne Hill, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Reed et al
as 3:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Recee Mae Reed
Defendant:
R Reed, D Reed, M Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
