Cases 31 - 40 of 5,250
Randolph v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Randolph
Defendant:
Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warren v. Salvant et al
as 4:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Byron J. Warren
Defendant:
Judge Wayne Salvant, Phil Sorrells, Attorney Tim Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2024cv02382
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Judge Ana Reyes, Judge Christopher Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
MOJKA KAZANCHY et al v. TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH et al
as 2:2024cv04115
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY MOJKA KAZANCHY and BRIAN KAZANCHY
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, GREG POFF, DARREN CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reyna v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00824
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Randolph Reyna
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RANDOLPH v. COPS MONITORING et al
as 1:2024cv04051
Plaintiff:
ATTALIA RANDOLPH
Defendant:
LYDIA SECURITY MONITORING, INC. D/B/A C.O.P.S. MONITORING
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Randolph v. Dzurenda
as 24-1647
Petitioner:
LOUIS RANDOLPH and Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
JAMES DZURENDA
(PS) Dayton v. Fairfield Mobile Home and Rv Park LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Edward Randolph Dayton
Defendant:
Fairfield Mobile Home and Rv Park LLC, Solano Superior Court and Thomas A. Ferrara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Randolph v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00230
Petitioner:
Larry Randolph
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
