Cases 1 - 10 of 666
Havard v. George County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Casey Thomas Havard
Defendant:
George County Correctional Facility, Terry Reid Rogers, Green County SMCI and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAUGHTRY v. CEKADA et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
MARTIQUE DAUGHTRY
Defendant:
CO CEKADA, CO RANKIN, CO HERKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ryan T. Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rankin v. McManus
as 5:2024hc02051
Petitioner:
Shurod Rankin
Respondent:
Shawn McManus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Norman v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Marcell Jeron Norman
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rankin v. Google
as 6:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Lawson Reed Rankin
Defendant:
Google
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burch
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Tessier et al
as 4:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Marain Larayonda Rankins
Defendant:
Dr. Tessier, Dr. Stacy, NaphCare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. Norwood et al
as 5:2024ct03089
Plaintiff:
Shurod Rankin
Defendant:
Lieutenant Norwood, Sergeant P. Fobbs and Major Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
