Cases 41 - 50 of 53
CLARK v. C.F.C.F. OFFICERS
as 2:2011cv04554
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CLARK
Defendant:
C.F.C.F. OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald Hoffarth et al v. Diversified Lending Group Inc et al
as 8:2011cv00336
Defendant:
Applied Equities Inc, Ray Arevalo, Cindy Baltimore and others
Plaintiff:
Sachiko Araki, Tadashi Araki, Tadshi Araki and others
Ecco Solutions et al v. BP Company North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04225
Plaintiff:
Ecco Solutions , Chris Moore , James Vincent and others
Defendant:
BP Company North America, Inc. , BP Corporation North America, Inc. , BP America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1333
CLARK v. C.F.C.F. WARDEN JOSEPH P. DELANEY
as 2:2010cv04971
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CLARK
Defendant:
C.F.C.F. WARDEN JOSEPH P. DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delmast v. Cardenas et al
as 4:2009cv00629
Plaintiff:
Samuel Dewayne Delmast
Defendant:
Alfonso Cardenas, Marty Hall, Matt Whitworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Deputy Clerk # 1160
as 1:2009cv01537
Plaintiff:
Raymond Clark
Defendant:
Deputy Clerk # 1160
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v.Thomas et al
as 0:2009cv02251
Plaintiff:
Raymond Clark, Jr
Defendant:
Mr Thomas, Sgt Baker, John Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Clark v. Adams, et al.
as 1:2009cv00155
Plaintiff:
Raymond Clark
Defendant:
Adams, Rosenquist, Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Raymond Clark v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2008cv07398
Plaintiff:
Raymond Clark
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv06075
Plaintiff:
Columbus Williams
Defendant:
The City of New York, Jose Vega, Raymond Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
