Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Williams v. Tullius et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Williams
Defendant:
Connor Michael Tullius, Wenger Farms LLC and Auto Owners Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Richard Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6077
Petitioner:
RICHARD LEO WILLIAMS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Richard Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6075
Petitioner:
RICHARD LEO WILLIAMS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Griffin v. Barroga et al
as 3:2023cv01590
Plaintiff:
Chazantine Griffin
Defendant:
Marissa Barroga, Debra Cruz, Julie Leschinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04886
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EVAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Iowa
as 6:2023cv02052
Petitioner:
Richard Leroy Williams
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dauzat v. Verizon Communications Inc et al
as 6:2023cv00800
Defendant:
Ricky Williams, Verizon Communications Inc doing business as Verizon, Ricky and others
Plaintiff:
Becky Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Caldwell et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv03899
Plaintiff:
Kyle M. Caldwell, Donald C. Finley, Ramzan J. Alli and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lapin et al v. Adamis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv03023
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lapin and Nurit Lapin
Defendant:
Adamis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Howard C. Birndorf, Meera J. Desai and others
WRIGHT v. MOODY et al
as 4:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
BLAIR LANSTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
ASHLEY BROOKE MOODY, FULVIO JOSEPH GENTILI, ROBERT R JULIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
