Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lee v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv11205
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Cox v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04328
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Cox
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Lee, Richard v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv00904
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jonathan Lee v. State of Minnesota
as 26-2745
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Richard Lee, also known as Jon Richard Lee
Defendant:
State of Minnesota
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2026cv00833
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Rex Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ukabam v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2026cv06923
Plaintiff:
Stephan Ukabam
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Police Department, Brendan Sperkles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2026cv06922
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Carter
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Police Department, Sgt. Richard Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Real Wood Products Co. et al v. Neuroth et al
as 6:2026cv01644
Plaintiff:
Real Wood Products Co., Steven G. Sogge and Tad S. Sogge
Defendant:
Richard Lee Neuroth and Kami Marie Fegles
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lee v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2026cv03202
Petitioner:
Jonathan Richard Lee and Jon Richard Lee
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
