Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Westfield Insurance Company v. Ritcher
as 1:2020cv12692
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jennifer Ritcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAYER v. RIWO, INC. et al
as 0:2019cv60208
Defendant:
RIWO, INC., ALEXANDER E. RITCHER and ROYAL BAVARIAN SCHNITZEL HAUS
Plaintiff:
RAINER G. MAYER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Bey et al v. Ford Motor Credit
as 1:2016cv00133
Plaintiff:
Mu Bey and Chin Bey
Defendant:
Ford Motor Credit, Jerome Riley, Bob Nilsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Ritcher
as 1:2015cv01550
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Lt. Ritcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sevilla v. Perez, et al.
as 1:2015cv03528
Defendant:
Marlena Arrizo, Michael Cardoza, Gadys Carrion and others
Plaintiff:
Marie Sevilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. Fox Lake Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2015cv00499
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Davis Smith and American Citizens of Wisconsin Paralegal Service and Civil Liberty Corporation
Defendant:
Fox Lake Correctional Institution , Randall R Hepp, CO Ritcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritcher-Avendano v. USA
as 2:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Ariel Ritcher-Avendano
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Canning v. Administration For Children's
as 13-4047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Adanna Canning and Joseph Canning
Defendant - Appellee:
Administration For Children's Services, Queens, Janet Ceasar, A.C.S Case Worker, Ronald Richter, Commissioner A.C.S. of Queens and others
GILBERT v. RITCHER et al
as 1:2012cv05133
Plaintiff:
JIHAD A. GILBERT
Defendant:
LT. RITCHER, DEPUTY WARDEN FOSSLER, DEPUTY WARDEN PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. ADKINS et al
as 1:2012cv05132
Plaintiff:
NATHAN JAMIL INGRAM
Defendant:
ALBERT RITCHER, CHRIS FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
