Cases 1 - 10 of 467
Hadassah Feinberg v. Ferdinand Cintron, Jr., et al
as 24-3009
Defendant:
FERDINAND CINTRON, JR., ROSA CRUZ, ALYSSA SCHATZ and others
Plaintiff:
HADASSAH FEINBERG
Sessions v. D.O.C. Commissioner et al
as 3:2024cv01632
Defendant:
Jesus Guadarrama, C.O. Moore, D.O.C. Commissioner and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Maurice Sessions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hadassah Feinberg v. Ferdinand Cintron, Jr.
as 24-1794
Defendant:
GABI WILLIAMS, CHRISTIAN RIBEC, SALLY LUPINI and others
Plaintiff:
HADASSAH FEINBERG
Robert Martin v. Citibank, NA
as 5:2024cv01753
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
Citibank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Feinberg v. Cintron et al
as 1:2024cv01377
Defendant:
Lee Ann Tarasi, Jeff Enders, Laval Miller-Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martins v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01965
Plaintiff:
Chad Robert Martins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARTIN
as 1:2024cv08197
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERT MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Feinberg v. Cintron et al
as 1:2024cv01957
Defendant:
Jeff Enders, Laval Miller-Wilson, Vincent Paese and others
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Martin v. USA Wireless At&T et al
as 3:2024cv01434
Defendant:
Sure Headquarters, Pre-Sonus Corporation, Boss Wireless and others
Interested Party:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.