Cases 1 - 10 of 458
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Watley v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Derek Watley
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Richard Ortyl, Brian Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cameron v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cameron
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Rollin Cook, Scott Semple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Serrano v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Serrano
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Sharonda Carlos, Robert Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparadeo v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Zachary Sparadeo
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarramma and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Asante v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Kwame O Asante
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarrama and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chisem v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Robert Chisem
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Richard Ortyl and Briant Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Andres Carroll
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Carol Chapdelaine, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
David George Williams
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarramma and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Richard Parker
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Sharonda Carlos, Robert Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
