Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Johnson v. Gagne
as 26-2796
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOHNSON
Defendant:
GERARD G. GAGNE, THOMAS KOCIENDA, LALITHA PIERI and others
Respondent:
ALEXANDER T. TAUBES
SEBASTIEN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2026cv03386
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF MYLES CODY SEBASTIEN, KELIE SEBASTIEN, BRIAN ANSLEY and others
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, THE SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Wright v. Cook
as 26-2667
Plaintiff:
IAN WRIGHT
Defendant:
ROBERT MARTIN, Correctional Warden, CARLOS NUNEZ, Correctional Deputy Warden, JONATHAN PEAU, Correctional Lieutenant and others
Martin v. Boss Wireless LLC et al
as 3:2026cv01143
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
Boss Wireless LLC, Line 6, Inc., Nady Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Martin et al v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2026cv01270
Defendant:
The United States of America, Richard Caulk, Unknown Heirs of Charles D. Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin and Genevieve Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409 (a) Quiet Title Action
Alston v. Martin et al
as 3:2026cv01249
Plaintiff:
Ira Alston
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Escourse, Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2026cv01242
Plaintiff:
Stephen Daniel Nelson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Robert Martin, DW- Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Butters et al
as 4:2026cv00419
Plaintiff:
Flynn Robert Martin
Defendant:
Vincent Butters and Cody J Loyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Clark et al
as 2:2026cv04609
Plaintiff:
David Campbell
Defendant:
Gina Clark, Wellpath LLC, SCOTT BOWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
