Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Wooten v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
as 1:2016cv06285
Plaintiff:
Robert Wooten
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and PFizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Immigration Center of America, LLC, et al.
as 3:2015cv00739
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Roberts
Defendant:
Immigration Center of America, LLC , Department of Homeland Security, Trinity Food Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wooten v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Robert Wooten
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wooten v. Brown, et al
as 2:2014cv02201
Plaintiff:
Robert Wooten
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr. , Kamala Harris , State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Call et al v. Warrior Energy Services Corp.
as 6:2014cv00018
Defendant:
Warrior Energy Services Corp.
Plaintiff:
Roderick Call , Derandal Childers , LaMarcus Coyle and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Robert Wooten v. State of California, et al
as 13-16851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WOOTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WOOTEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv03608
Petitioner:
ROBERT WOOTEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wooten v. The State of California et al
as 2:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
Robert Wooten
Defendant:
State of California and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Wooten v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al
as 12-16971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WOOTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., ARGENT MORTGAGE, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and others
Wooten v. Countrywide Home Loans, et al
as 2:2011cv01791
Plaintiff:
Robert Wooten
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Argent Mortgage, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
