Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 173
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff: A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant: CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner: MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master: JOSE L. LINARES
In Re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor: MYLAN INC.
Interested Party: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00995
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline and others
Interested Party: MEIJER INC.
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Lead Plaintiff: KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Not Yet Classified: MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC., MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C., FWK HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC et al (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv12653
Defendant: Shire PLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings LLC
Consolidated Plaintiff: Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff: Meijer Distribution, Inc., Meijer, Inc. and BI-LO, LLC
Intervenor Defendant: Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant: WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified: HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re: EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master: JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party: IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff: Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner: TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
In re Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv04361
Defendant: Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Drogueria Betances, LLC, H-E-B LP, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc., Turlock Irrigation District and UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund
Respondent: Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Lupin Ltd., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., OptumRX, Inc. and others
Interested Party: Caremark PHC, LLC and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
In Re: Opana ER Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv10150
In Re: Opana ER Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., Value Drug Company, Kim Mahaffay and others
Defendant: Impax Laboratories, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02516
Defendant: Teva Women's Health, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: Pirelli Armstrong Retiree Medical Benefits Trust, Operating Engineers Local 312 Health and Welfare Trust, A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Buildings Trade Welfare Plan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company
Claimant: Lonny DiTella
Interested Party: Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc., PAR Pharmaceutical, Inc., Aetna Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: Generic Pharmaceutical Association
Cause Of Action: MDL 2516 In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff: United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant: Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court: All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
as 1:2009md02084
Plaintiff: George Steven Legrand, Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc., Maxi Drug, Inc. doing business as Brooks Pharmacy and others
Counter Defendant: Meijer Inc and Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
In Re: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
Defendant: Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Perrigo Company, Par Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Respondent: King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., Miami-Luken, Inc., Prescription Supply, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: Paddock Laboratories Inc
Petitioner: AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp., Besins Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013md02472
Plaintiff: Fraternal Order of Police Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Rite-Aid Corporation and others
Defendant: Warner Chilcott Holdings Company III, Ltd., Warner Chilcott Sales (US), LLC, Warner Chilcott Company, LLC and others
Interested Party: Health Care Service Corporation, Caremark, LLC, CVS Health Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?