Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CARRINGTON v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv00809
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MACON CARRINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
SENATOR RON JOHNSON, MARK ZUCKERBURG, FACEBOOK/OCCULUS RIFT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARRINGTON, JR. v. STARNES et al
as 1:2021cv00457
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY, SENATOR RON JOHNSON, RICHARD BRAD STARNES and others
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MACON CARRINGTON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03139
Plaintiff:
Holly A. Johnson and Ron Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CX Reinsurance Company Limited v. Caplan et al
as 1:2017cv00227
Plaintiff:
CX Reinsurance Company Limited
Defendant:
Mildred K. Caplan, Estate of Sidney C. Caplan, Tynisha Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Tyrone Hurt v. U. S. Senator Ron Johnson
as 15-2451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES SENATOR RON JOHNSON, UNITED STATES SENATE, (100 members) and UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, (455 members)
Hurt v. United States Senator Ron Johnson, et al
as 5:2015cv00517
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
United States Senator Ron Johnson, United States Senate and United States House of Representatives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Phyllis Beima et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02305
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Beima , Mary Belden , Felicitas Corbell and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02556
Plaintiff:
Rosalie K. Johnson and Ron Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boone et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2008cv00279
Plaintiff:
Larry W. Boone and Barbara A. Boone
Defendant:
Ron Johnson and Paragon Title Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
