Cases 1 - 10 of 75
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Aguilar et al v. Digital Risk Mortgage Services, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00354
Defendant:
Digital Risk Mortgage Services, LLC, Digital Risk, LLC, MPHASIS Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bryant and Jackie Aguilar
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
BRYANT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv57736
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fernandez v. Bryant et al
as 2:2019cv01367
Defendant:
Sgt. Ronald Bryant, Phoenix Insurance Company and Ronald Bryant
Plaintiff:
Michael Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fernandez v. Bryant et al
as 2:2019cv01366
Defendant:
Sgt. Ronald Bryant and the Phoenix Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Michael Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant Group Inc. et al v. Blubaugh et al
as 1:2019cv01659
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bryant, Bryant Group Inc. and Ronald D. Bryant
Defendant:
Blubaugh Plumbing LLC and Steven Blubaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MOLSON v. DISANTIS et al
as 1:2019cv00037
Defendant:
MARCEL MALLORY, JUDGE JOHN GAHART, MARK SAUDER and others
Plaintiff:
ROWENA MOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETOFF v. HOLMAN et al
as 1:2018cv00156
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PETOFF
Defendant:
MICHAEL HOLMAN, GARY SEYMOUR and RONALD BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrix v. Ray et al
as 3:2018cv00244
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, S Boyer, Ronald Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
