Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Drakos v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drakos v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Drakos v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Melissa Morris and Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Ogg et al
as 2:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas
Defendant:
Kim Ogg, Ken Paxton, Molly Wurzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice et al
as 2:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Flannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Julius Walker Irick Jr et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01748
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Julius Walker Irick, Jr, Jerry Allen Hall, Albert Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Ronald Wooten v. Federal Medical Center, Lexington, et al
as 23-5281
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD THOMAS WOOTEN
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, LEXINGTON, JOHN DOE, Warden, LT. LAWSON and others
Thomas v. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) et al
as 3:2023cv16698
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) et al
as 3:2023cv14760
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Pfizer Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
