Cases 1 - 10 of 2,995
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv04319
Plaintiff:
"John" Does and Jane Does
Defendant:
New York City, Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LANE v. VANATA et al
as 2:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN LANE
Defendant:
BRIANNA C. VANATA, DAVID RUSSO and MATTHEW RUCINSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSSO v. CENCORA, INC.
as 2:2024cv02582
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RUSSO
Defendant:
CENCORA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Russo v. Hi-Tech Electric, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01484
Plaintiff:
Patrick Russo
Defendant:
Hi-Tech Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Russo et al v. Raimondo et al
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Dominick Russo, James Russo and FFC Seafood, Inc.
Defendant:
Gina Raimondo, Janet Coit and National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sharp v. Comber et al
as 2:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Shannon Sharp
Defendant:
Joshua Ryan Comber, Earnest Robert Russo and City of Cottonwood Heights
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montgomery v. Russo
as 2:2024cv02440
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Montgomery
Defendant:
Genevive Russo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Brill et al
as 1:2024cv11459
Plaintiff:
Jobari J Johnson
Defendant:
Sgt Brill, Lt Russo, C.O Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis #223815 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lamont Davis #223815
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Grand Prairie Healthcare Services, Danya Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
