Cases 1 - 10 of 142
United States of America v. Goodman (Evans)
as 24-1258
Defendant:
WILLIE EVANS, JERLAINE LITTLE, DARON GOODMAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Echevarria (Heyward)
as 24-1060
Defendant:
TJON MACOLL, ANDREW ECHEVARRIA, JONATHAN RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Boykin v. AT&T, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02973
Plaintiff:
Rah-Nita Boykin
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
United States of America v. Echevarria (Simmons)
as 24-938
Defendant:
NAQUANN SIMMONS, TJON MACOLL, ANDREW ECHEVARRIA and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Boykin et al v. loanDepot, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02583
Plaintiff:
Rah-Nita Boykin and Jessica Smith
Defendant:
loanDepot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Markus v. United States of America
as 24-811
Petitioner:
RAMELL MARKUS, Rah, Dollah and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McKeon v. RAH Equity Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Sean McKeon, M.D. and Sean McKeon
Defendant:
RAH Equity Holdings, LLC and Premier Imaging Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Biondi v. RAH Equity Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Michael Biondi
Defendant:
RAH Equity Holdings, LLC and Premier Imaging Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
United States of America v. Goodman (Jamarr Simmons)
as 23-7971
Defendant:
JERLAINE LITTLE, DARON GOODMAN, ALBERT SHOULDERS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMARR SIMMONS and Sealed Defendant 2
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Boykin et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Rah-Nita Boykin, Jennifer Harmon and Elizabeth Rodriguez
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
