Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Knight v. Nassau County
as 20-2760
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Randall Knight
Defendant / Appellee:
Nassau County
Anderson et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2020cv02328
Plaintiff:
Elaine Anderson, Erik Villagran, Scott Burst and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00958
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Knight et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv18910
Plaintiff:
Laura L. Knight and Tony Randall Knight
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Knight et al
as 2:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Randall Knight, Becky Knight, Tommy Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Sims et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 4:2011cv00914
Plaintiff:
Tommy Sims , Randall Knight and K&S Farms
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience Holding Inc , Bayer Corporation , Bayer AG and others
Cross_claimant:
Riceland Foods Inc
Cross_defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer BioScience NV, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sims et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 2:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Tommy Sims , Randall Knight and K&S Farms
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience Holding Inc , Bayer Corporation , Bayer AG and others
Cross_claimant:
Riceland Foods Inc
Cross_defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer BioScience NV, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knight et al v. Fedex Freight East, Inc.
as 9:2007cv80344
Plaintiff:
Randall Knight and Beatrice Knight
Defendant:
Fedex Freight East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
