Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lonnie Gilbert, Jr. v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, et al
as 24-1061
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Ray Gilbert, Jr.
Defendant:
Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, Lambert, Sgt., Pulaski County Detention Center and Jones, Sgt., Pulaski County Detention Center
Gilbert v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility
as 4:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Ray Gilbert, Jr
Defendant:
Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, Lambert and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ubiera v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Altagracia Delrosario Ubiera
Defendant:
Wydette Williams, Johnny Hedgemon, Deshaun Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Weirich et al
as 2:2021cv02741
Plaintiff:
Terrance Williams
Defendant:
Amy Weirich, Shelby County, Memphis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Massac County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2019cv00747
Defendant:
Massac County Sheriff's Department, John Coleman and Patrick McCoy
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Dunn et al
as 1:2018cv00444
Defendant:
Jeff Dunn, Grant Culliver, Cheryl Price and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ady v. Rodrigous et al
as 5:2018cv00887
Defendant:
FNU Rodrigous, FNU Brown and Ray "Gilbert" LNU
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Ady, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Kenyton et al
as 3:2016cv01111
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Gilbert
Defendant:
C/O Kenyton, John Koleman and Ted Holder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Kenyton et al
as 3:2016cv00460
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Gilbert
Defendant:
C/O Kenyton, Ted Holder and John Koleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv05126
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Gilbert
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
