Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ritter v. Buckeye Machine Fabricators, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01501
Plaintiff:
Charles Ritter
Defendant:
Buckeye Machine Fabricators, Inc. and D. Ray Marshall
United States of America v. Gray (Christopher Coke)
as 21-1932
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Hughie Gray, AKA Hugh Goldson, AKA Michael Grant, Sharon Hinds, Lloyd Reid, AKA Kevin and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Michael Coke, AKA President, AKA Michael Christopher Coke, AKA Paul Christopher Scott, AKA Shortman, AKA Duddus, AKA Presi, AKA General
Kenneth Marshall v. Dexter Payne
as 20-3372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Ray Marshall
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director
Marshall v. Payne
as 4:2020cv00732
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2018cv01624
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Marshall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MARSHALL v. VERDE ENERGY USA, INC.
as 2:2018cv01344
Plaintiff:
RAY MARSHALL
Defendant:
VERDE ENERGY USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris et al v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2012cv00542
Plaintiff:
Derius Harris and Ray Marshall
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi, Malcolm McMillian and Tyrone Lewis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USAA Life Insurance Company, Inc. v. Ray-Marshall et al
as 5:2012cv00597
Defendant:
Dorothy L Ray and Raenell Ray-Marshall
Plaintiff:
USAA Life Insurance Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Harris et al v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
Derius Harris , Ray Marshall and Latanya Sturgis
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi and Malcolm McMillan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kenneth Marshall v. Ray Hobb
as 11-1283
Petitioner:
Kenneth Ray Marshall
Respondent:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
