Cases 1 - 10 of 24
PATTERSON v. WILKES
as 5:2023cv00267
Petitioner:
DANIEL RAY PATTERSON
Defendant:
WARDEN SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson
as 1:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PATTERSON v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2022cv01827
Plaintiff:
RAY PATTERSON
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00627
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PATTERSON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv13795
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and others
Plaintiff:
VERNON RAY PATTERSON
In Re:
PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Navarro Molina V. Sierra Express, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00031
Plaintiff:
Samuel Navarro Molina
Defendant:
Billy Ray Patterson and Sierra Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Defoe v. Patterson
as 6:2018cv00599
Plaintiff:
Joshua Defoe
Defendant:
Tonny Ray Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sims et al v. Cook County Illinois et al
as 1:2016cv10767
Plaintiff:
Ardamis Darrell Sims, Burundi Antonio Martin, Larry D Woods and others
Defendant:
Cook County Illinois, Thomas Dart, Toni Preckwinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. USA (2255-2:99-cr-0551 WBS)
as 2:2016cv01515
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kevin Ray Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Patterson v. Parris
as 3:2015cv00237
Petitioner:
Anthony Ray Patterson
Respondent:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
