Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Wallace v. Unknown Defendant
as 6:2022cv00481
Petitioner:
Billy Ray Wallace
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. May
as 4:2022cv01141
Petitioner:
Johnny Ray Wallace
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv02387
Petitioner:
David Ray Wallace
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. David Wallace
as 19-10589
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID RAY WALLACE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Adidas AG et al v. The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 0:2019cv60457
Plaintiff:
adidas International Marketing B.V., Adidas America, Inc. and Adidas AG
Defendant:
The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", jinyumantang1868-6, Edison Shop and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bullock et al v. McBurney et al
as 1:2016cv04633
Plaintiff:
Peter Bullock , J. Michael Cantrell , Nathaniel Carpenter and others
Defendant:
Willard B. McBurney , John C. McBurney , Franklin B. McBurney and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Jeffrey Hill v. Ray Wallace, et al
as 16-4434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeffrey L. Hill
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Wallace, Lee Kriehbiel and University of Arkansas at Fort Smith
Billy Wallace v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-41342
Petitioner - Appellant:
BILLY RAY WALLACE
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
