Cases 1 - 10 of 8,746
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trice v. Unknown et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Trice
Defendant:
Unknown, Chad Nixon, Matt Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Raymond P. Ortiz, Daniel Reichman and Torres Junior Vicente
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond David v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1773
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DAVID
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
SAMS v. PRETORIOUS
as 2:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
RAYMOND D. SAMS
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond McElroy v. Jonah Beadles, et al
as 24-1865
Plaintiff:
Raymond McElroy
Defendant:
Jonah Beadles, Deputy Sheriff, Greene County Jail and James Arnott, Sheriff, Greene County Jail
GOODEN v. ROYCE et al
as 1:2024cv05440
Petitioner:
MAURICE GOODEN
Respondent:
RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond Gill v. Jennifer Broton, et al
as 24-11236
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Defendant:
JENNIFER A. BROTON, AVERY, B. PAVIGLIQNTI and others
Kevin Dwayne Walker v. Superior Court of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv03326
Petitioner:
Kevin Dwayne Walker
Respondent:
Superior Court of Los Angeles and Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
