Cases 21 - 30 of 31,551
Cooper v. Orr et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Cooper
Defendant:
Ryan Orr and Kenneth R. Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raymond v. Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc.
as 1:2024cv21512
Plaintiff:
Richard Raymond
Defendant:
Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
GOODEN v. ROYCE et al
as 1:2024cv05440
Petitioner:
MAURICE GOODEN
Respondent:
RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mustion et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03079
Plaintiff:
Zane Mustion, Curtis Wright, Ronald Trotter and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Waller v. Phillips et al
as 4:2024cv01529
Plaintiff:
Sherman Waller
Defendant:
Mary Phillips, Raymond Fidel, Clay Scheitzach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Raymond Gill v. Jennifer Broton, et al
as 24-11236
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Defendant:
JENNIFER A. BROTON, AVERY, B. PAVIGLIQNTI and others
Kevin Dwayne Walker v. Superior Court of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv03326
Petitioner:
Kevin Dwayne Walker
Respondent:
Superior Court of Los Angeles and Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01188
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Michael Cruz v. Bryant Camareno, et al
as 24-11217
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CRUZ
Defendant:
BRYANT RAYMOND CAMARENO, UNKNOWN LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENTS, DEBRALY DELGADO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
