Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ray v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv10629
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ray
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nieto v. Honee et al
as 1:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ray Nieto, Jr
Defendant:
FNU Honee, FNU Webb, FNU Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cepull v. Spalding County et al
as 3:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Justin Cepull
Defendant:
Spalding County , Spalding County Board of Commissioners , Rita Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Raymond Locklear
as 13-4719
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYMOND RAY LOCKLEAR, a/k/a Rambo
Proctor v. Colvin (CONSENT)
as 2:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ray Proctor
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sanders v. Spalding County Board of Commissioners et al
as 3:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
Will Sanders
Defendant:
Spalding County Board of Commissioners , Gwen Flowers Taylor , Raymond Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wat Phramahajanaka, Inc. v. County of Spalding, Georgia et al
as 3:2011cv00174
Plaintiff:
Wat Phramahajanaka, Inc.
Defendant:
County of Spalding, Georgia , Gwen Flowers-Taylor , Raymond Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roche v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2011cv00302
Petitioner:
Raymond Ray Roche
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raymond Ray v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 2:2011cv01477
Defendant:
Does and Wells Fargo Bank
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ray
BURDINE et al v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62126
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND RAY BURDINE and JENEANE BURDINE
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
