Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Harper et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02837
Defendant: Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff: Carl J Harper, Leon Guy Patterson, Sr, Wayne Earl Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Harper et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00669
Plaintiff: Carl J Harper, Leon Guy Patterson, Sr, Wayne Earl Paul and others
Defendant: 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Raymond RogersIn re: Raymond Rogers
as 22-50615
Petitioner: In re: Raymond Rogers
Rogers v. Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 6:2022cv00613
Plaintiff: Raymond Rogers
Defendant: Board of Pardons and Parole and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fisher et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01297
Plaintiff: John T. Fisher, III, Annie S. Fisher, Sara D. Murray and others
Defendant: Abner Smith, Jonathan Kasper, Dana Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Rogers v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00390
Petitioner: Raymond Rogers
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raymond RogersIn re: Raymond Rogers
as 21-50162
Petitioner: In re: Raymond Rogers
Rogers v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00194
Petitioner: Raymond Rogers
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rogers v. Lumpkin
as 6:2020cv01196
Petitioner: Raymond Rogers
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richmond v. Bergey Pullman Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00246
Defendant: Bergey Pullman Inc, Arby's Franchisor LLC, Does 1 - 10 and others
Plaintiff: Myrriah Richmond and Raymond Rogers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?