Cases 61 - 70 of 1,321
REESE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv04223
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE W. REESE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Reese
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Cynthia Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEITH v. IN DEPT. OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv01334
Plaintiff:
REESE KEITH
Defendant:
IN DEPT. OF CORRECTION, JACK HENDRIX and WILLIAM WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flynn v. Lunsford
as 4:2023cv04072
Plaintiff:
Derrick Anthony Flynn, Jr
Defendant:
Reese Lunsford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colin Diggie v. USA
as 23-35504
Petitioner / Appellant:
COLIN REESE DIGGIE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Reese v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Quinton Reese
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections and State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flynn v. Lunsford
as 4:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Derrick Anthony Flynn, Jr
Defendant:
Reese Lunsford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush et al v. Luzerne County et al
as 3:2023cv01152
Plaintiff:
Catherine Bush, Stevie Rae Dickson and Lynn Yurksha
Defendant:
Luzerne County, Mark Rockovich, Wellpath, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Howard Reese, II
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese, Dontay v. Jackson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Dontay Lavarice Reese
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Duane M Waldera, Chief Deputy Adam M. Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
