Cases 41 - 50 of 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00286
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Brown et al v. Reiser et al
as 7:2019cv11588
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Miller and Michael A. Brown
Defendant:
T A Charko and E. E. Reiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Salvation Army et al
as 4:2019cv00362
Defendant:
Aaron Rodriguez, Salvation Army, Christopher Chiodo and others
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Miller, Jr.
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Donati v. Brian Frosh
as 19-7567
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN E. FROSH and WARDEN RICHARD E. MILLER
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL E. DONATI
Miller v. State Of Louisiana et al
as 3:2019cv00678
Defendant:
State Of Louisiana, Jason Kent and James M LeBlanc
Plaintiff:
Richard Nathaniel Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atiyeh et al v. Borough of Gettysburg et al
as 1:2019cv01412
Defendant:
Susan Naugle, John Lawver, Borough of Gettysburg and others
Plaintiff:
Gettysburg Investors LLC, Jamilie Abraham LLC, Gallery 30 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03102
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAHMOOD v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv02084
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, RICHARD L. MILLER, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN and others
Plaintiff:
HAWAZEN S. MAHMOOD
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Miller v. Hooper et al
as 3:2019cv00212
Defendant:
Elayn Hunt Correctional Center and Tim Hooper
Plaintiff:
Richard Nathaniel Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mortgage Partner v. MB Riverside Place LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00173
Plaintiff:
Mortgage Partner
Defendant:
Richard H. Miller, David W. Bates and MB Riverside Place LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
