Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Richard Minielly v. Acme Cryogenics Inc, et al
as 17-2585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD MATTHEW MINIELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
ACME CRYOGENICS INC, JOEL HANSEN, TERRY BRUBAKER and others
Blake, Jr. v. Navient Solutions, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Richard Matthew Blake, Jr.
Defendant:
Navient Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
TD Ameritrade v. Matthews
as 3:2016cv00136
Plaintiff:
TD Ameritrade
Defendant:
James Richard Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanders v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv02202
Petitioner:
Richard Matthew Sanders
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
National Association of Forensic Counselors, Inc. et al v. Narconon International et al
as 1:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
National Association of Forensic Counselors, Inc. and American Academy of Certified Forensic Counselors Inc
Defendant:
Narconon International, Narconon of Georgia Inc, Friends of Narconon Intl and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
MINIELLY v. ACME CRYOGENICS, INC. et al
as 5:2015cv06164
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MATTHEW MINIELLY
Defendant:
ACME CRYOGENICS, INC. , JOEL HANSEN , TERRY BRUBAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Richard Matthew Martin v. Kim Holland
as 2:2015cv02687
Respondent:
Kim Holland
Petitioner:
Richard Matthew Martin
Schultz v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv02444
Plaintiff:
Richard Matthew Schultz
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Arthur Matthews El v. Harold Clarke
as 14-6959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR RICHARD MATTHEWS EL, a/k/a Arthur Richard Matthews, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Eastern Regional Director, RENEE WOODSON, Eastern Regional Ombudsman, Human Rights Advocate and others
Matthews v. The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 2:2013cv13986
Plaintiff:
Richard Matthews
Defendant:
The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
