Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Hullum v. McDonald et al
as 1:2025cv12315
Plaintiff:
Lance Hullum
Defendant:
Joseph D. McDonald, Jr., Gerald Pudolsky, Antone Moniz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickron v. Proctor
as 3:2025cv00060
Plaintiff:
Russell Pickron
Defendant:
Mayor Richard Proctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Royce v. Proctor
as 3:2024cv00213
Defendant:
Mayor Richard Proctor
Plaintiff:
Robert Royce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Pickron v. Proctor et al
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Russell Pickron
Defendant:
Mayor Richard Proctor and Willie J Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
PROCTOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30565
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PROCTOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Proctor v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv13956
Plaintiff:
Richard Proctor
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Proctor et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv11584
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Proctor and Arlene Proctor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Streetman v. Fort Smith, City of et al
as 2:2020cv02136
Defendant:
Joseph Underwood, Fort Smith, City of, Giselle Elmore and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Sue Streetman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proctor v. USA - 2255
as 8:2020cv01628
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Petitioner:
John Richard Proctor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. John Proctor
as 19-7071
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN RICHARD PROCTOR
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
