Cases 71 - 80 of 153
Secretary, Department of Labor v. JR Reds, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00459
Plaintiff:
Secretary, Department of Labor
Defendant:
JR Reds, LLC and Richard Thompson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Watson v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00760
Plaintiff:
Rickey Watson
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi , Hinds County Sheriff's Department , Richard Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. D'ILIO
as 3:2013cv06282
Petitioner:
RICHARD THOMPSON
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Palma et al v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's et al
as 7:2013cv00575
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyd's , Suzanne Ehrhardt and Richard Thompson
Plaintiff:
Miguel Palma and Maria I. Palma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall v. Saginaw, City of et al
as 2:2013cv14141
Defendant:
Saginaw, City of, Anjanette Wojciechowski, Roger Pate and others
Plaintiff:
Jewell Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Connick et al
as 2:2013cv05854
Plaintiff:
Percy M Taylor
Defendant:
Paul Connick, Jr, Richard Thompson and Unidentified Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Borgstrom et al
as 5:2013cv04096
Plaintiff:
Richard Thompson
Defendant:
John J. Borgstrom, AirGas USA. LLC and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marx v. Forsyth County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2013cv00175
Plaintiff:
Dennis Marx
Defendant:
Forsyth County Sheriff's Office, Robert Heagerty, R. J. Wiggins and others
HAYES v. TWO BRIDGES REGIONAL JAIL et al
as 2:2013cv00288
Plaintiff:
AMANDA HAYES
Defendant:
TWO BRIDGES REGIONAL JAIL , COL MARK WESTRUM , LT RICHARD THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
