Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Vickers v. State of Florida et al
as 5:2016cv00317
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kenny Vickers
Defendant:
State of Florida, Jeff Dawsy, Kenneth Ware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STERLIN v. MACY'S, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01208
Plaintiff:
BEATRICE STERLIN
Defendant:
MACY'S, INC., MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., TERRY J. LUNDGREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Martin v. Herny et al
as 1:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nick J Martin
Defendant:
Marty Herny, Tommy Essiex, Coca Cola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. State of Florida et al
as 5:2015cv00373
Plaintiff:
Joseph Vickers
Defendant:
State of Florida, Citrus County Sheriff's Office, Jeff Dawsy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US Logistics, LLC v. West Edge Freight, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00273
Plaintiff:
US Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
West Edge Freight, Inc., Rick Howard, Maria Soloranzo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. A-Alert Security Services, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv03537
Plaintiff:
Shwanda Jones , Shakira Lee , Tamara Jackson and others
Defendant:
A-Alert Security Services, INC., Promex Midwest Corporation, DRE, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Stenger, et al v. Bi-State Development Agency, et al
as 15-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Stenger, Tim Dempsey, Mike Little and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bi-State Development Agency of Missouri/Illinois Metropolitan District, doing business as Metro
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 788
Stenger et al v. Bi-State Development Agency of Missouri/Illinois Metropolitan District
as 4:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Michael Stenger , Tim Dempsey , Mike Little and others
Defendant:
Bi-State Development Agency of Missouri/Illinois Metropolitan District
Intervenor_defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union, Diviision 788
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
