Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Owens et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant:
Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. TN Dept of Corrections
as 1:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Linda R. Thomas, Ricky Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hill v. Hurst
as 4:2023cv01213
Plaintiff:
Rickie Hill
Defendant:
Rita Hurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hill v. Beard et al
as 3:2023cv01346
Plaintiff:
Ricky Hill
Defendant:
Jason Beard, Eric Murphy and Gonzales Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harber et al v. Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
as 3:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Joshua Harber, Nicholas Irvin, Stephen Looney and others
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
Not Classified By Court:
SJC Coroner Patricia Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
