Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Grayson Jr v. State of Tennessee, The
as 3:2023cv00549
Petitioner:
Ricky Lane Grayson Jr
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson v. Martin
as 3:2023cv00351
Petitioner:
Ricky Lane Grayson
Respondent:
Frink Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARTLEY et al v. HATCHER et al
as 5:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
WANDA BARTLEY and RICKY LANE SILVERS
Defendant:
LATRICE HATCHER, SHANTREL JACKSON, DANIELLE JACKSON and others
Not Classified By Court:
SOUTHWESTERN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Burgess v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lane Burgess
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SLOAN v. REESE et al
as 2:2015cv03407
Plaintiff:
CLYDE J. SLOAN
Defendant:
RICKY LANE REESE and USAIRWAYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Geary et al v. Liberty Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00764
Plaintiff:
Gene Geary , Ricky Lane , Susan Lane and others
Defendant:
Liberty Industries, Inc. and Unifirst Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ricky Gilmore v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-41168
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICKY LANE GILMORE
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Gilmore v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2013cv00193
Petitioner:
Ricky Lane Gilmore
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
