Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Rippy v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 3:2023cv22201
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., SANOFI S.A., AVENTIS PHARMA S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Janet Rippy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bond et al v. Skillman et al
as 6:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Crystal Bond and Douglas Bond
Defendant:
Logan Skillman, Stephen Rippy, John Glerum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight Oil Tools, Inc. et al v. ACE American Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv03310
Plaintiff:
KNIGHT OIL TOOLS, INC. and RIPPY OIL COMPANY
Defendant:
ACE American Insurance Company, Chartis Specialty Insurance Company and Risk Specialists Companies Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
USA v. James Rippy
as 23-2572
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES D.E. RIPPY
RIPPY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15746
Plaintiff:
GLENN RIPPY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
John Galipeau, K Watts, Gann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentini v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Rick Wayne Valentini
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Ibarra, Unknown Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Reed et al
as 7:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Defendant:
Stephanie Reed, Mary Jane Dolan, Ryan Zuidema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rippy v. County of Sacramento
as 2:2022cv01511
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rippy
Defendant:
County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thomas v. Waterman et al
as 7:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Douglas Jerome Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
G.L. Waterman, Ryan Zaidema, Mary Jane Dolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
