Cases 1 - 10 of 17
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al
as 3:2022cv08016
Plaintiff:
Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant:
HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv08271
Plaintiff:
Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant:
HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hale et al v. Leiss et al
as 1:2021cv01028
Plaintiff:
Penny Lee Valentine-Hale and Thomas Matthew Hale
Defendant:
Derry Township Police Department, Robert E. Bennett, Sean J. Sargen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin et al v. Bennett
as 4:2019cv00315
Plaintiff:
K. B, Kierra Sharta Martin and Kierra Shanta Martin
Defendant:
Robert K. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bennett et al v. Kingman, City of
as 3:2019cv08001
Defendant:
Kingman, City of
Plaintiff:
Judith D Bennett and Robert E Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl Dowty v. D.C.I. Special Agents, et al
as 12-2998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Earl D. Dowty
Defendant - Appellee:
D.C.I. Special Agents, Robert A. Bennett, Special Agent and David B. Keith, Special Agent
Herrera v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2012cv00602
Defendant:
Leon Aberasturi, Adams, Robert J. Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
John Herrera, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dowty v. D.C.I. Special Agents et al
as 4:2012cv04002
Plaintiff:
Earl David Dowty
Defendant:
Robert A. Bennett and David B. Keith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phares v. Phares et al
as 1:2011cv00403
Plaintiff:
Rhett Banker Phares
Defendant:
Harry Banker Phares, Belinda Sharron Welch-Phares, Saeed A Ally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomes v. New York Public Library
as 11-1685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joe A. Gomes
Defendant - Appellee:
New York Public Library, Science Industry & Business Library, City of New York and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
