Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Evans v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Robert Evans
Defendant:
Ron Neal, White and Garrison
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DUSHAN ZATECKY, ROBERT EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL et al v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
MIKAL S. MITCHELL, KAL SHAREEF EL, SERGIO ROSADO and others
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY, DAVID KELSEY, ARAMARK CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDING v. KRISS et al
as 2:2021cv00289
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HARDING
Defendant:
KRISS, DUSHAN ZATECKY, ROBERT EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Lewis
as 4:2019cv00635
Respondent:
Jason Lewis
Petitioner:
Robert Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans v. Lewis
as 1:2019cv00056
Respondent:
Jason Lewis
Petitioner:
Robert Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Decatur, City of, Alabama et al
as 7:2018cv02050
Plaintiff:
Robert Evans Lewis, III
Defendant:
Derrick Anderson and Decatur, City of, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Alabama Department of Mental Health et al
as 5:2018cv01187
Plaintiff:
Robert Evans Lewis, III
Defendant:
Lynn T Beshear, Alabama Department of Mental Health and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Hooks et al
as 5:2017ct03113
Plaintiff:
Marlow Williams
Defendant:
Erik A. Hooks and Robert Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. USA
as 3:2016cv00067
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JAMES ROBERT EVANS, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
