Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mallett v. Davis et al
as 3:2021cv00157
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mallett
Defendant:
Kenneth Davis, John K Sparks, Jr, Richard E Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Ford
as 1:2018cv03578
Petitioner:
Robert Freeman
Respondent:
Benjamin Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aurit v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Corrections, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. NAPH Care et al
as 2:2017cv02345
Defendant:
Clark County Det Center, Robert Freeman, Law Firm of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Freeman v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-50680
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ROBERT FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Freeman v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2015cv00305
Petitioner:
James Robert Freeman
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2015cv00789
Petitioner:
James Robert Freeman
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freeman v. Southern Health Partners
as 3:2012cv00990
Plaintiff:
Robert Freeman
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYS v. FREEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv03179
Petitioner:
RONALD MAYS
Respondent:
ROBERT FREEMAN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE PHILA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freeman et al v. Troutt et al
as 3:2012cv00266
Plaintiff:
Robert Freeman, Kenneth Blaylock, Johnny Davis and others
Defendant:
Sonya Troutt and Sonny Weatherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
