Cases 81 - 90 of 94
STEWART v. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK CO. et al
as 2:2009cv62906
Plaintiff:
YOSHII STEWART, YOSHII STEWART, YOSHII STEWART and others
Defendant:
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK CO., NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK CO., NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
EDWARDS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
STEVEN E. EDWARDS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DOUGLAS CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robert Hamilton v. Margaret Beightler
as 09-3115
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT HAMILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
MARGARET BEIGHTLER, Warden
Barber et al v. City of Santa Rosa et al
as 3:2008cv05649
Plaintiff:
Valerie Barber, Valerie Barber, Valerie Barber and others
Defendant:
City of Santa Rosa, County of Sonoma, Edwin Flint and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hamilton v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17717
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Company, Illinois Tool Works, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Hamilton and Robert Hamilton
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ramirez v. Martinez et al
as 4:2008cv01034
Petitioner:
Carlos Ramirez
Respondent:
Jerry Martinez, Douglas Sabin, Scott Blake and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stacey v. Wilmore et al
as 3:2008mc00041
Plaintiff:
Tony J. Stacey
Defendant:
David Wilmore, City of Lebanon Police Dept., Richard Broadhead and others
Hamilton v. Beightler
as 1:2007cv02591
Petitioner:
Robert Hamilton
Respondent:
Margaret A. Beightler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
